NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nash [2019] NSWDC 64 Hearing dates: 30 January 2019 – 31 January 2019 Decision date: 31 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Sutherland SC DCJ Decision: Decline to stay the indictment Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings Legislation Cited: Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 Traffic Act Cases Cited: Chitwood v United States (178 F 442(1910)) Connolly v The Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254 DPP v Skewes [2002] NSWSC 1008 Garrett v R [1977] HCA 67; (1977) 139 CLR 437 Mraz v The Queen(No 2) [1956] HCA 54; (1956) 96 CLR 62 R v Humphrys [1977] AC 1 R v McDermott [1899] 24 VLR R v Storey [1978] HCA (1978) 140 CLR 364 R v Whitby (1957) 74 WN (NSW) 441 R v Wilkes [1948] HCA 22; (1948) 77 CLR 511 R v Vatmer [1992] 29 NSWLR 311 Reg. v. Ollis [1900] 2 Q.B. 758 Rogers v R, variously reported in 181 CLR 251 and 123 ALR 417, Rogers v R [1994] HCA 42; (1994) 181 CLR 251 Sambasivam v. Public Prosecutor Federation of Malaya [1950] AC 458 Wayne Andrew Reid v R (unreported 28 April 2017) Weaver v Law Society of New South Wales (1979) 142 CLR 201 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Bernard Andrew Nash (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr Barrett for the Crown Mr Strickland for the Accused File Number(s): 2015/00341212
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate