NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gwardys v R [2019] NSWCCA 62 Hearing dates: 11 March 2019 Date of orders: 29 March 2019 Decision date: 29 March 2019 Before: Payne JA at [1] Bellew J at [3] Campbell J at [54] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Appeal – Importing a quantity of cocaine in excess of the marketable quantity – Where sentencing judge failed to take into account the utilitarian value of the applicant's plea of guilty – Error established
CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Appeal – Applicant re-sentenced in the fresh exercise of the sentencing discretion –– Where applicant entitled to a discount of 25% to reflect the utilitarian value of the early plea of guilty – Serious offending – Where applicant was responsible for the physical importation of a quantity of cocaine substantially in excess of the marketable quantity – Applicant remorseful with good prospects of rehabilitation – Where sentence of 6 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years imprisonment was imposed by the sentencing judge – No lesser sentence warranted in the fresh exercise of the sentencing discretion Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Criminal Code Regulations 2002 (Cth) Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) Cases Cited: Baladjam v R [2018] NSWCCA 304 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Okafor v R [2007] NSWCCA 147 Onuorah v R [2009] NSWCCA 238 R v Barrientos [1999] NSWCCA 1 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; (2010) 205 A Crim R 106 R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Paliwala [2005] NSWCCA 221 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550 Wong v R; Leung v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4 Texts Cited: Major Drug Offences – Current Sentencing Practices: Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council (2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patryk Krzysztof Gwardys - Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: A G Melick QC and E James – Applicant R Ranken – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate