NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pham v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWDC 73 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 6 and 7 March 2019 Date of orders: 29 March 2019 Decision date: 29 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge J Smith SC Decision: Verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. The exhibits are to be returned. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further orders of the Court are required. Catchwords: TORTS – Intentional – unlawful arrest, assault and battery – reasonable grounds that offence was committed – lawfulness of arrest – power to discontinue arrest – proceedings dismissed. Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1924 (Cth) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3B, 21, 52 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 545B Crimes (Domestic & Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Law Enforcement (Powers & Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), ss 23, 99, 105, 201, 230, 231 Law Enforcement (Powers & Responsibilities) Amendment (Arrest without Warrant) Act 2013 (NSW), No. 98 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 (NSW), s 8 Cases Cited: Barton v Armstrong [1969] 2 NSWR 451 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Adams Bidco Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 34 Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Gulic v Boral Transport Ltd [2016] NSWCA 269 Holgate-Mohammed v Duke [1984] AC 437 Hyder v Commonwealth [2012] NSWCA 336 Nevin v B & R Enclosures [2004] NSWCA 339 O'Hara v Chief Constable of Royal Ulster Constabulary [1997] AC 286 Poidevin v Semaan (2013) 85 NSWLR 758 Ruddock v Taylor (2005) 222 CLR 612 State of New South Wales v Cuthbertson [2018] NSWCA 320 State of New South Wales v McMaster [2015] NSWCA 228 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 Viavattene v R [2018] NSWCCA 197 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 Wolfenden v International Theme Park Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 78 Woodley v Boyd [2001] NSWCA 35 Zaravinos v State of New South Wales (2004) 62 NSWLR 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Nguyen Son Pham – Plaintiff State of New South Wales – Defendant Representation: Applicant appeared in person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate