NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Moore v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWIRComm 1021 Hearing dates: 21 January 2019 Date of orders: 03 April 2019 Decision date: 03 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Constant Decision: The respondent's application for a costs order is dismissed Catchwords: COSTS - unfair dismissal application dismissed – whether application vexatious or frivolous or instituted without reasonable cause - whether applicant unreasonably failed to agree to a settlement of the claim – whether applicant engaged in conduct inconsistent with intention to settle proceedings – costs order refused Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), ss 84, 181 Cases Cited: Attorney General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Bankstown City Council v Paris [1999] 93 IR 209 Bromley-Hoult v Belgravia Health & Leisure Group Pty Ltd T/A Ascot Vale Leisure Centre [2018] FWC 4979 (27 August 2018) Colefax v Secretary, Department of Education (No 4) [2019] NSWIRComm 1017 Dr A v Health District (No 4) [2014] NSWIRComm 56 Four Sons Pty Ltd v Sakchai Limsiripothong (No 2) [2000] 100 IR 400 Imogen Pty Ltd v Sangwin (1996) 70 IR 25 Kanan v Australian Postal and Telecommunications Union of Australia (1992) 43 IR 257 Peden v Lake Macquarie Refrigeration Pty Ltd (2003) 134 IR 149 Phillips v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Anor [2006] NSWCA 183 Tapia v Emibarb Pty Ltd t/as Lagoon Seafood Restaurant [2005] NSWIRComm 232 Category: Costs Parties: Isobel Natalie Ruth Moore (applicant North Sydney Council (respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Berrigan Doube Lawyers (applicant) Bartier Perry (respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00107198
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate