NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kate Singleton Pty Ltd and SJ Connelly CPP Pty Ltd t/as Planners North v Department of Planning and Environment [2019] NSWCATAD 50 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 28 March 2019 Decision date: 28 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review - government information – personal information – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298 Marden v Pharmacy Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 34 Veall v Department of Planning and Environment [2018] NSWCATAD 47 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kate Singleton Pty Ltd and SJ Connelly CPP Pty Ltd t/as Planners North (Applicant) Department of Planning and Environment (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: S Connelly (Self Represented)(Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office(Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00204324 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the respondents on a confidential basis. That material is not to be released to either the applicant or to the public.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate