NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brysha v Kingmill Pty Ltd t/as Thrifty Car Rental [2018] NSWCATCD 81 Hearing dates: 17 September 2018 Date of orders: 04 December 2018 Decision date: 04 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: J A Ringrose, General Member Decision: 1. The Tribunal orders that the applicant, Jake Brysha, is not required to pay the respondent, Kingmill Pty Ltd t/as Thrifty Car Rental the sum of $8,939.00 or any other sum, apart from the insurance excess which has already been paid, arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 30 March 2018 in South Hobart, Tasmania involving a Toyota Yaris, registered number XXX XX. Catchwords: Insurance cover provided with a car rental –attempts to exclude liability for insurance – meaning of driving dangerously or recklessly Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law 2010 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 Cases Cited: Kane v Dureau [1911] VLR 293 Quigley v Becker unrep WASC 22 July 1997 per White J R v Coventry [1938] 59 CLR 633 R v Burnside [1962] VR 96 R v Lawrence [1982] AC 510 Thompson v Copeland [1936] SASR 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jake Brysha (Applicant) Kingmill Pty Ltd t/as Thrifty Car Hire (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented) Mr Fehre (Recoveries Officer (Respondent) File Number(s): MV 18/25686 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate