NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Firoz Esskandarpor v Lithgow City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1126 Hearing dates: 06 March 2019 Date of orders: 06 March 2019 Decision date: 06 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: The Court orders are: 1) The appeal is dismissed. 2) Development Application DA182/17 for a new dwelling and secondary dwelling or home office at 29 Mort Street, Lithgow is refused. 3) The exhibits are returned other than Exhibits A and 1. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: insufficient information in order to assess development application – requirement for structural engineering details to confirm ability to retain proposed structures and adjoining dwelling; bushfire requirements – applicant focused on alleged past activities on the site and of the Council and neighbours rather than the requirements of the application – Court cannot be satisfied on the basis of the evidence provided as to the structural works required to be undertaken and their impact on the development – applicant raises concern with history, process and Court – applicant did not attend hearing Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Lithgow City Local Environmental Plan 2014 Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Texts Cited: Australian Standard AS3959-2009 Construction of buildings in bushfire prone areas Land and Environment Court Practice Note – Class 1 Residential Development Appeals Category: Principal judgment Parties: Firoz Esskandarpor (Applicant) Lithgow City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: J Fan, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate