NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Odeh v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 342 Hearing dates: 1 May, 8 June 2018 Date of orders: 01 April 2019 Decision date: 01 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Leave to file the proposed Amended Statement of Claim, to which the Notice of Motion refers, is refused;
(2) Motion dismissed;
(3) Leave is granted to the plaintiff to file, within 28 days of these orders, a further Notice of Motion seeking leave to file an Amended Statement of Claim, that complies with the principles of pleading, and accords with these reasons for judgment;
(4) Leave to join the putative third defendant is refused;
(5) The plaintiff shall pay the defendants' costs of and incidental to the Motion. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Statement of Claim insufficiently pleaded – proposed Amended Statement of Claim has similar difficulties – leave refused to file – leave granted to try again Cases Cited: A v State of New South Wales (2007) 230 CLR 500; [2007] HCA 10 Clavel v Savage [2013] NSWSC 775 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Husam Ali Odeh (Plaintiff/Applicant) State of New South Wales (First Defendant/Respondent) Zina Al-Obiady (Second Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Hall – Solicitor (Plaintiff/Applicant) S T Chrysantou / H Elachkar (First Defendant/Respondent) C Freer (Second Defendant/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate