NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wright v Tuhaka; Tuhaka v Wright [2016] NSWDC 444 Hearing dates: 24 March 2016 Date of orders: 31 March 2016 Decision date: 31 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the application with costs. (2) List for directions on Thursday, 7 April 2016 at 10am before the Judicial Registrar. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - application to restrain solicitor from acting against former client – confidential information – relevant information Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 District Court Act 1973, s 46 Cases Cited: Everett v Neale [2012] NSWDC 73 Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561 Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 146 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (a firm) [1999] 1 All ER 517; [1999] 2 AC 222 Sanna v Wyse and Young International Pty Limited & Others (No.1) [2015] NSWSC 580 Watson v Watson (Santow J, 25 May 1998, New South Wales Supreme Court, unreported) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2015/231512 Shane Wright – first plaintiff Commercial & Domestic Restorations Pty Limited – second plaintiff Corey Tuhaka - defendant
2015/72694 Corey Tuhaka – plaintiff Shane Wright - defendant Representation: Counsel: Shane Wright and Commercial & Domestic Restorations Pty Limited – Ms I J King Corey Tuhaka – Mr J Ireland
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate