NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners SP No 8075 v Esh Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 93 Hearing dates: 27, 28 & 29 March 2019 Date of orders: 29 March 2019 Decision date: 29 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: There should be judgment for the plaintiff as against each of the defendants for the sum of $494,665.78. If I am mistaken as to the amount of the interest, it will be for the parties to apply for a variation of the amount of the judgment. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – s 177 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – duty of care "not to do anything that removes the support to any other land – whether encompasses omissions – where owner holds non-delegable duty of care.
NEGLIGENCE – breach of duty – reasonable-precautions – whether failed causation established – whether recurrent costs reasonable.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – defendants' failing to adduce evidence.
Jones v Dunkel defence.
Blatch v Archer Maxim – pleading – whether plaintiff precluded from relying on s177 of Conveyancing Act Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: BCI Finances Pty Ltd (in liq) v Binetter (No.4) [2016] FCA 1351 Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969 Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 170 CLR 520 Evans v Balog [1976] 1 NSWLR 36 John Llavero v Brett Anthony Shearer [2014] NSWSC 1336 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Lym International Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011] NSWCA 303 Pantalone v Alaouie (1989) 18 NSWLR 119 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Braverus Maritime Inc (2004) 140 FCR 445 Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330 Strong v Woolworths (2012) 246 CLR 182 Water Board v Moustakas (1987) 180 CLR 491 Texts Cited: Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies Law Reform Commission of New South Wales, Report 84 'The Right to Support from Adjoining Land' (1997) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Strata Plan 8058 (Plaintiff) Esh Property Group Pty Ltd & Ors (Defendants) Representation: Counsel: Mr Perla (Plaintiff) Mr Follino-Gallo (First to Fifth Defendants) Mr Cazzi – (Sixth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate