NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matthews v Strathfield Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 1141 Hearing dates: 19 March 2019 Date of orders: 05 April 2019 Decision date: 05 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans; (2) The objection pursuant to cl 4.6 of the Strathfield Local Environmental Plan 2012 in respect of the minimum lot size standard is not sustained; (3) The appeal is dismissed; (4) Development application DA 2017/132 for Torrens title subdivision of 26 Dean Street, South Strathfield is refused; (5) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits A, B, H and 4. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Torrens Title subdivision of existing land of into two allotments –variation to minimum lot size standard – whether cl 4.6 request should be upheld – is the request reasonable and well founded – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Strathfield Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 190 Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWCA 248 Initial Action v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118 Randwick City Council v Micaul Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 7 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446 Texts Cited: Strathfield Development Control Plan 2005 Strathfield Direct Development Contributions Plan 2010-2030 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eric Matthews (First Applicant) Sharmistha Singh (Second Applicant) Strathfield Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Dr J Smith (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate