NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Balach v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWSC 377 Hearing dates: 2 April 2019 Date of orders: 02 April 2019 Decision date: 02 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Orders in accordance with the consent order (see paragraph [14]) Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Section 52, crimes appeal and review Act – Appeal to Supreme Court – person convicted or sentenced in Local Court has right to appeal to Supreme Court – ground must involve question of law – magistrate erred because reasons did not adhere to legal standard – conviction and sentence quashed – matter remitted to Local Court
CRIMINAL LAW – Local Court – crimes sentencing procedure Act – section 10 – practice and procedure –absence of the defendant Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 52 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 182, 209 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10 Cases Cited: Hayes v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWSC 378 Roylance v Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] NSWSC 933 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Limited (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mir Muhammad Balach (Plaintiff) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M. Burke (Plaintiff) W. Langley (Defendant)
Solicitors: Armstrong Legal (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2918/59826
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate