NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2019] NSWCA 70 Hearing dates: 27 March 2019 Date of orders: 27 March 2019 Decision date: 12 April 2019 Before: McCallum JA at [1] Sackville AJA at [15] Decision: 1. By consent, within 14 days, the respondent is to provide a response in the nature of a pleading to the "particulars of representation by silence by ANZ" document dated 7 December 2018.
2. The summons seeking leave to appeal filed 12 March 2019 is dismissed.
3. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summons seeking leave to appeal against decision refusing application for disclosure of documents and leave to issue subpoenas – whether documents were necessary for the resolution of the real issues in dispute – finding by primary judge that the need for disclosure was obviated by a concession made by the respondent – no error or injustice established Legislation Cited: Practice Note SC Eq 11 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(e) Cases Cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v James (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 59 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235; [1956] HCA 27 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Anthony James (applicant) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Pritchard SC, Mr J Baird (applicant) Mr R Foreman, Ms K Boyd (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate