NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v Yu [2019] NSWSC 400 Hearing dates: 17 May 2018 Decision date: 12 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: 1. Dismiss the summons; 2. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – assessment of damages under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) – adequacy of reasons – whether finding of loss of earning capacity unsupported by medical evidence – whether assessor failed to engage with insurer's argument Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 94(4), 94(5), 126 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244; 61 MVR 443 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr (2012) 83 NSWLR 302; [2012] NSWCA 13 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088 Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1; [1995] HCA 5 Zahed v IAG Ltd trading as NRMA Insurance [2016] NSWCA 55; 75 MVR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance (plaintiff) Yuchen Yu (first defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (second defendant) Terence Stern (in his capacity as a Claims Assessor appointed by SIRA) (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: KP Rewell SC (plaintiff) M Neil QC, J de Greenlaw (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate