NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gill v Summit Building Design and Construction Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATCD 5 Hearing dates: 21 September 2018 Date of orders: 18 January 2019 Decision date: 18 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: S Thode, Senior Member Decision: 1. The respondent, Summit Building Design and Construction Pty Ltd shall pay $84,494.00 to the applicants, Paramjit Singh Gill and Taswinder Kaur Brar by 1 March 2019. Catchwords: BREACH OF CONTRACT - repudiation– assessment of damages – work order – weight of evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013; Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 248; Clements v Murphy [2018] NSWCATAP 152; Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 54; (1991) 174 CLR 64 at 125; per Dixon J and McTiernan J in Fink v Fink [1946] HCA 54; (1946) 74 CLR 127 at 143; per Einstein J in Murray v Shillingtonsworth (2006) 68 NSWLR 451; Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115; Lacchese v McDonnell [2018] NSWCATAP 120; Wesiak v D&R Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 353; McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd [1933] HCA 25; (1933) 48 CLR 457 NCON V Australia Ltd v Spotlight Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 604. P and M Kaye Ltd v Hosier & Dickinson Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 146; Pattullo v EPK Kitchens Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 230 Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 17 at 33, 40, Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 ; McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd [1933] HCA 25; (1933) 48 CLR 457 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paramjit Singh Gill & Taswinder Kaur Brar (Applicants) Summit Building Design & Construction Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr Robertson Carroll & O'Dea Solicitors (Applicants) Mr Adams, Adams and Partners (Respondent) File Number(s): HB 18/10575 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate