NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: A-Tech Australia Pty Ltd v Top Pacific Construction Aust Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 404 Hearing dates: 21, 22 March; 1 April 2019 Date of orders: 12 April 2019 Decision date: 12 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Parker J Decision: Proceedings adjourned for the entry of final orders and the hearing of any application by the defendant for a stay. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – construction contracts – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) – application for recovery of "claimed amount" as a debt due – validity of payment claims - whether payment claims sufficiently identified contract work - whether email sufficiently identified contract works to constitute a payment schedule – validity of service of payment claims - service by email pursuant to s 31(1)(c) - where no direct evidence of time of receipt .
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – construction contracts – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) – cross-claim for breach of contract and set off for damages – contractual effect of consent orders - whether agreement by consent bore contractual force such that application for judgment could not be sought in advance of determination of cross-claim - whether notwithstanding agreement cross-claim may be used as a defence pursuant to s 15(4) - whether s 34 would otherwise invalidate an agreement purporting to contract out of the jurisdiction of the Act. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security for Payment 1999 (NSW), ss 13(2), 14, 15, 31(1)(c), 34 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2, The Australian Consumer Law, s 18 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW), s13A Cases Cited: Barnden v Zulian; Barnden v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] NSWSC 1980 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd (2006) 67 NSWLR 9; [2006] NSWCA 238 Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Coulls v Bagot's Executor and Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 199 CLR 460; [1967] HCA 3 Falgat Constructions Pty Ltd v Equity Australia Corp Pty Ltd (2007) 23 BCL 292; [2006] NSWCA 259 Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367; [1971] HCA 39 Impero Pacific Group Pty Ltd v Bonheur Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 286 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 573 Mullins v Howell (1879) 11 Ch D 763 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Luikens and Anor [2003] NSWSC 1140 National Benzole Co Ltd v Gooch [1961] 1 WLR 1489 Purcell v F C Trigell Ltd [1971] 1 QB 358 Qantas Airways Ltd v Gubbins (1992) 28 NSWLR 26 Woods v Sheriff of Queensland (1895) 6 QLJ 163 Category: Principal judgment Parties: A-Tech Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Top Pacific Construction Aust Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: FP Hicks SC/J Nathan (Plaintiff) F Santisi (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate