NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DVA v University of Sydney [2019] NSWCATAD 59 Hearing dates: 5 February 2019 Date of orders: 15 April 2019 Decision date: 15 April 2019 Before: S Scahill Senior Member Decision: Application dismissed under section 55(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 2013, for want of prosecution Catchwords: Application for leave to proceed; dismissal for want of prosecution Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCCA 388 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Roberts v Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia [2016] NSWCATOD 129 Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749 Witten v Lombard Australia Ltd (1968) 88 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 405 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: DVA (Applicant) University of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Ms Sarah Heesom (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00325806 Publication restriction: The Tribunal orders under section 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of the Applicant's name and the name of any staff member of the University of Sydney be prohibited.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Orders under Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 1. At the hearing of the Application on 5 February 2019, the Tribunal made orders under section 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 set out below, prohibiting the publication of the Applicant's name and the name of any staff member of the University of Sydney. Accordingly, these reasons refer to the Applicant and staff members of the Respondent in anonymised terms.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate