NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mills Oakley (Partnership) v Asset HQ Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 122 Hearing dates: 05/04/2019 Date of orders: 12 April 2019 Decision date: 12 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: (1) I set aside the judgement in favour of the Plaintiff entered 3 October 2017 (2) I direct the Defendant to file a Defence within fourteen days. (3) I will hear the parties as to costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Default Judgment – Setting aside – judgment entered in circumstances against good faith – whether sufficient cause should be shown – extensive delay by applicant Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules 2015 Cases Cited: Adams v Kennick Trading (Intl) Ltd (1986) 4 NSWLR 503 Dai v Zui [2013] NSWCA 412 Kendle v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] NSWSC 1999 Roach v B&W Steel Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 110 Shirriff v Nominal Defendant [1999] NSWCA 152 Simpson v Alexander (1926) 26 SR (NSW) 296 Smith v Budandan Enterprises [2002] 55 NSWLR 367 Violi v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2015] NSWCA 152 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mills Oakley (Plaintiff) Asset HQ Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M. Lapirow (for the Plaintiff) Mr G. McDonald (for the Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate