NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Denton [2019] NSWCCA 81 Hearing dates: 8 April 2019 Date of orders: 08 April 2019 Decision date: 16 April 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [9]; Hamill J at [10] Decision: Prosecution appeal under s 5F(3A) dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – interlocutory appeal against ruling on evidence – sexual assault – pictures of penis – where complainant draws picture of respondent's penis – frenulum – "abnormal skin flap" – where trial Judge excludes police photographs of penis – whether admissible – expert evidence – where no evidence that frenulum abnormal – relevance – probative value – unfair prejudice – trial Judge correct Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2) and 66C(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 56 and 137 Cases Cited: Korgbara v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 84; (2007) 170 A Crim R 568 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650; [2001] HCA 50 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Thomas Denton Representation: Counsel: H Roberts; M Kumar (Regina) G Gillett (Denton)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Regina) Macedone Legal (Denton) File Number(s): 2017/00069651 Publication restriction: No publication until the conclusion of the trial. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 4 April 2019 Before: Sweeney DCJ File Number(s): 2017/00069651
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate