NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hawkesbury Sports Council v Martin [2019] NSWCA 76 Hearing dates: 18 June 2018 Date of orders: 16 April 2019 Decision date: 16 April 2019 Before: Meagher JA and Emmett AJA at [1]; Simpson AJA at [44] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside judgment and orders of the District Court made on 1 July 2017 and in lieu thereof order that the proceedings be dismissed. 3. The respondent pay the appellants' costs at first instance and on appeal, and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) in relation to the costs at first instance if eligible. 4. Cross appeal dismissed. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – breach of duty – where risk of harm obvious – where not established that risk not insignificant – whether content of duty required precaution of removing steel cable
EVIDENCE – opinion evidence – expert opinion – where expert "civil engineer" and "building consultant" – where opinion as to human visual perception – whether expert has "specialised knowledge" – whether opinion wholly or substantially based on such specialised knowledge
EVIDENCE – photographic evidence – where witness testifies photographs accurately show accident scene, including conditions of light and shade at time of accident – whether photographs evidence of light and shade conditions as affected visibility of objects shown
DAMAGES – gratuitous domestic assistance – where provider of assistance already in receipt of carer's pension – adequacy of reasons explaining quantification – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B-5C, 5F-H, 5R, 15-16, 42 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 79 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), Ch 6 Pts 1, 2 and Ch 12 Pts 1, 3, ss 24, 35, 355, 370 Social Security Act 1999 (Cth), s 198 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144; (2008) Aust Torts Rep 81-956 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Goode v Angland (2017) 96 NSWLR 503; [2017] NSWCA 311 Gordon v Truong; Truong v Gordon [2014] NSWCA 97 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 51 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Miller v Galderisi [2009] NSWCA 353 Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42 Thomson v Woolworths (Q'land) Pty Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 234; [2005] HCA 19 Velevksi v R [2002] HCA 4; (2002) 187 ALR 233 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hawkesbury Sports Council Incorporated (First Appellant); Hawkesbury City Council (Second Appellant); Apaula Anna Losa Martin (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC / D Kelly (Appellants) H Marshall SC / A McSpedden (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate