NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Midland Metals Overseas PTE Limited v Australian Cablemakers Association Limited [2019] NSWCA 78 Hearing dates: 20 March 2019 Date of orders: 17 April 2019 Decision date: 17 April 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Payne JA at [7]; Sackville AJA at [83] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed; (2) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: TRADE AND COMMERCE – Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18 – whether conduct misleading or deceptive – common ground that letters contained incorrect representations – whether the letters had tendency to lead the recipient Ministers into error – inquiry to be conducted by reference to objective characteristics of recipient – inquiry to be conducted prospectively – no likelihood that the letter would lead Ministers into error
TRADE AND COMMERCE – Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18 – whether conduct in trade and commerce – where letters sent to government Ministers informing them of electrical cable safety concerns – where body making impugned representations is a representative group for Australian cable manufacturers – where impugned representations relate to electrical cable safety standards
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – where issues not raised at trial sought to be agitated – appellant not permitted to reframe its case not put below – Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 and Metwally v University of Wollongong (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; 59 ALJR 481 applied Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18 Cases Cited: Australian Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640; [2013] HCA 54 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594; [1990] HCA 17 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Kuru v New South Wales (2008) 236 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 26 Metwally v University of Wollongong (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; 59 ALJR 481 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 MultiCon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corp (1997) 47 NSWLR 631; [1997] NSWCA 214 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191; [1982] HCA 44 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Tobacco Institute of Australia v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations (1992) 38 FCR 1 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Investment Infrastructure Management Ltd (2000) 200 CLR 591; [2000] HCA 11 Village Building Company Pty Ltd v Canberra Airport Pty Ltd (2004) 139 FCR 330; [2004] FCAFC 240 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48; (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Midland Metals Overseas PTE Limited (ARBN 053 006 330) (Appellant) Australian Cablemakers Association Limited (ACN 152 736 466) (First Respondent) Frederick Persson (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Coles QC / P Walsh (Appellant) M Izzo SC / J Granger (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate