NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Katramados v Hasapis (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 435 Hearing dates: 20 February 2019 Decision date: 18 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See paragraphs 117-118 Catchwords: COSTS — Payable out of a fund — Deceased estate — Relevant principles
SUCCESSION — Family provision and maintenance — Consideration of issues requiring determination before final orders can be made — Uncertainty regarding value of estate — Impact of Greek taxation law on value of Greek estate — Effect of new evidence concerning same after principal judgment already handed down — Case management
SUCCESSION — Family provision and maintenance — Consideration of issues requiring determination before final orders can be made — Significance of costs orders for the terms of available family provision orders — Case management Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G Cases Cited: Bell v Crewes [2011] NSWSC 1159 Katramados v Hasapis [2018] NSWSC 948 Katramados v Hasapis (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1604 Category: Costs Parties: Julia Katramados (plaintiff) Despina Hasapis (first defendant) Adriana Kalantzis (second defendant) Maria Kalantzis (third defendant) Vassilis Kalantzis (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Hill (plaintiff) N C T Bilinsky (third defendant) D Williams (fourth defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate