NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cappello v Roads and Maritime Services & Anor. [2019] NSWSC 439 Hearing dates: 15 April 2019 Date of orders: 18 April 2019 Decision date: 18 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Refuse relief sought in the Amended Summons filed on 25 March 2019; (2) Dismiss the proceedings; (3) Order the plaintiffs to pay the first defendant's costs; (4) No order as to the Registrar-Generals costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – legal effect of proposed acquisition notice – statutory authority of Roads and Maritime Service to acquire land under s 177 of Roads Act – source of RMS's legal authority to acquire land.
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Roads Act 1993 – meaning of s 177 – construed to favour private property rights – statutory power only enlivened after identification of objective purpose of Act – purpose of the Act are to be found in all the provisions of the statute – s 64 marker of a statutory purpose of Roads Act – carry out functions of road authority with respect to proposed tollway – s 71 – road works widely defined – carry out roadwork – s 63 ministerial directions – all functions of road authority, to the fullest extent possible to become responsibility of RMS – proposed acquisition notice authorised by law. Legislation Cited: Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth), s 140 Environment and Planning Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 5 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), ss 11, 13, 14, 20 Roads Act 1993 (NSW), ss 7, 52, 54, 63, 64, 71, 177, 178, 213 Cases Cited: Darkingung Pty Ltd v Darkingung Local Aboriginal Land Council [2006] NSW SC 1008; (2006) 203 FLR 394 James v Cowen (1929 – 1930) 43 CLR 386 Municipal Officers Association of Australia v Lancaster (1981) 54 FLR 129 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Wilkinson v Hull Railway and Dock Co (1882) 20 Ch.D. 323 Zang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rosario Cappello (Plaintiff) Roads and Maritime Services (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B.A. Coles QC with G. Farland and M. Keene (Plaintiff) N.J. Owens SC with L. Waterson and L. Johnston (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate