NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Garfox 86 Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 442 Hearing dates: 11 March 2019 Date of orders: 18 April 2019 Decision date: 18 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Rees J Decision: Reinstatement of Garfox 86 Pty Ltd ACN 002 839 170 and ancillary orders: see [26]. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Dissolution — Reinstatement — Where company twice deregistered administratively for non-payment of fees — Company holds real property — Company solvent — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 601AH(3)(d) — Scope of Court's power — Orders made for re-organisation of shareholding and officeholding to reflect parties' dealings. Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 13 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 201A(1), 204A(1), 601AD, 601AH Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] NSWSC 316 CGU Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Rockwall Interiors Pty Ltd (2006) 201 FLR 296; [2006] NSWSC 690 In the matter of A.C.N. 063 346 708 (formerly known as South Passage Pty Ltd) [2018] NSWSC 1709 In the matter of Bele & Co Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1824 In the matter of Regional Planners Developments Co Pty Ltd (2015) 100 ACSR 457; [2015] NSWSC 1996 Melluish v Underwood Development Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 429 Pagnon v Workcover Queensland [2001] 2 Qd R 492; [2000] QCA 421 Randall v City of Canada Bay Council [2017] NSWCA 1 Randall v City of Canada Bay Council (No.4) [2015] NSWSC 1759 Re European Metal Recyclers Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (deregistered) [2018] NSWSC 946 The Bell Group Limited v Australian Securities and Investments (2018) 128 ACSR 247; [2018] FCA 884 Texts Cited: Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (8th ed., 2014, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Donald Hintin Soo (Plaintiff) Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K.J. Young (Plaintiff) Solicitors: W.B. Scott & Tong (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate