NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yapp v Pollak [2019] NSWSC 449 Hearing dates: 10 April 2019 Date of orders: 24 April 2019 Decision date: 24 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Orders made for specific performance of contract for sale of land. Catchwords: LAND LAW – contract for sale of land – claim by vendor for specific performance – construction – special condition in contract stipulated that the vendor agrees to replace lower staircase in the property in accordance with a Development Approval prior to settlement – special condition further stipulated that "the vendor warrants that all Development Consent Conditions will be satisfied on or before completion" and will provide an occupation certificate prior to settlement – where not all works permitted by Development Approval had been carried out – whether special condition required the vendor to complete all the works the subject of the Development Approval – special condition held to require only the replacement of lower staircase and provision of an occupation certificate in respect of that work – vendor held to have complied with special condition – specific performance ordered Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 109H Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and Other Provisions) Regulation 2017 (NSW), cl 18 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Hartnett [2016] NSWCA 342 Jireh International Pty Ltd t/as Gloria Jean's Coffee v Western Exports Services Inc [2011] NSWCA 137 Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA (2014) 89 NSWLR 633; [2014] NSWCA 184 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (2011) 15 BPR 29,545; [2011] NSWCA 297 Teele v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1940) 63 CLR 201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ian Martin Yapp (First Plaintiff/First Cross Defendant) George Orena (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross Defendant) Joseph Pollak (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B A Coles QC with Mr P B Walsh (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) Mr G Farland (Defendant/Cross Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate