NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Paul v Forestry Corporation of NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 68 Hearing dates: 27 February 2019 Date of orders: 26 April 2019 Decision date: 26 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – government information – refusal to deal with application – whether dealing with the application would involve an unreasonable and substantial diversion of resources – whether multiple applications are related. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) State Records Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Colefax v Department of Education and Communities (No 2) [2013] NSWADT 130 Commissioner of Police (NSW) v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Hanna v NSW Ministry of Health [2019] NSWCATAD 21 Loussikian v University of Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 14 Singh v Legal Aid Commission (No.2) [2015] NSWCATAD 5 Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2016] NSWCATAD 49 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick Paul (Applicant) Forestry Corporation of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: I Paul (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00288779 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate