NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan No 91322 v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney [2019] NSWCA 89 Hearing dates: 24 April 2019 Decision date: 24 May 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; McCallum JA at [3] Decision: Grant leave to appeal, if required; dismiss the appeal; the appellant to pay the respondents' costs. Catchwords: LAND LAW – strata title – leasehold strata scheme – enforcement of statutory warranties – whether holder of a 99-year lease a "successor in title" under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 3A 18B, 18C, 18D, 99(1)(b) Strata Scheme Developments Act 2015 (NSW), s 24, Sch 8, cl 4 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW), s 7 Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act 1986 (NSW) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, s 254 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 101(1), 101(2)(e), 103, s 127 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 14.28, 28.2, 28.4, 36.11(2), 36.12 Cases Cited: Ace Woollahra Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan 61424 & Anor (2010) 77 NSWLR 613; [2010] NSWCA 101 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 CIC Insurance Limited v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384; [1997] HCA 2 Gardez Nominees Pty Ltd v NSW Self Insurance Corporation [2016] NSWSC 532 Mount Bruce Mining v Wright Prospecting (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Plymouth Brethren (Exclusive Brethren) Christian Church v The Age Company Ltd; Plymouth Brethren (Exclusive Brethren) Christian Church v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 739; [2018] NSWCA 95 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Taite v Gosling (1879) 11 Ch D 273 Tulk v Moxhay (1848) 2 Ph 774 Younan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 335 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Owners - Strata Plan 91322 (appellant) Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney (first respondent) Spring Cove Developments Pty Ltd (second respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Coles QC, B DeBuse (appellant) MA Ashhurst SC, S Duggan (respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate