NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DKR v Children's Guardian [2019] NSWCATAD 72 Hearing dates: 13 November 2018 Date of orders: 30 April 2019 Decision date: 30 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Senior Member L Houlahan, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the respondent, made on 2 March 2018, to refuse the applicant application for a working with children check clearance is set aside. (2) In substitution for the decision of the respondent, the following decision is made: the applicant is granted a working with children check clearance. Catchwords: CHILD protection – working with children – whether any real and appreciable risk to children – seven years ago the applicant charged with a number of offences of aggravated sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault – all charges dismissed at committal – no prior or subsequent reports of inappropriate conduct Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: BJB v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian (No 2) [2014] NSWCATAD 164 BKE v Office of the Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 BSR v Office of the Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCADTAD 264 Commissioner for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 11 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 Eckersley and Minister for Capital Territory (1979) 2 ALD 303; [1979] AATA 59 Holbrook and Australian Postal Commission (1983) 5 ALN N46, [1983] AATA 40 M v M [1988] HCA 68; (1988) 166 CLR 69 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 4 ALD 139, (1980) 44 FLR 41, [1980] FCA 85 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v QAAH of 2004 [2006] HCA 53; (2006) 231 CLR 1 Smith v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 184 ZZ v Secretary, Department of Justice [2013] VSC 267 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: DKR (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M C McGorey (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate