NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Reisner v Bridge Housing Limited [2019] NSWCATAP 109 Hearing dates: 9 April 2019 Date of orders: 30 April 2019 Decision date: 30 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President M Harrowell, Principal Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES – Housing Act 2001 –Residential Tenancies Act 2010 – Concurrent Lease – Right of concurrent lessee to enforce residential tenancy agreement in Tribunal proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Housing Act 2001 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) Cases Cited: Gilsan v Optus [No 2] [2005] NSWSC 38 Trust Co of Australia v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWSC 792 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Koidu Reisner (Appellant) Bridge Housing Limited (Respondent) Representation: No appearance (Appellant)
J O'Connor & N Simpson of counsel (Respondent) Instructed by M Dobson File Number(s): AP 18/53078 Publication restriction: Unrestricted Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 27 November 2018 Before: C Campbell, General Member File Number(s): SH 17/48457
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate