NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Toth v State of NSW [2019] NSWDC 148 Hearing dates: 11 April 2019 Date of orders: 29 April 2019 Decision date: 29 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: See paragraph [64] for orders. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – notice of motion by applicant defendant seeking to dismiss the applicant plaintiff's proceedings pursuant to UCPR r 13.4, or alternatively, to strike out the respondent plaintiff's amended statement of claim pursuant to UCPR r 14.28 – amended statement of claim struck out in part – case management directions for re-pleading of a further amended statement of claim and for evidence-in-chief to be by way of signed statements and document bundles – order for mediation Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 26, s 56, s 57, s 58, s 61, s 63, s 67 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91L Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 2A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9, s 10 Crown Proceedings Act 1988 (NSW), s 5 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 (NSW), s 8(1) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 13.4, r 14.28, Pt 15, r 15, r 15.5, r 31.4 Cases Cited: Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 Cleary v Jeans [2006] NSWCA 9 Cox v Journeaux (1935) 52 CLR 713; [1935] HCA 48 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioner (1949) 78 CLR 62; [1949] HCA 1 Dickens (a pseudonym) v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 222 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97 Mohareb v Kelso [2017] NSWCA 98 Obeid v Lockley [2018] NSWCA 71 Paramasivam v Flynn (1998) FCR 489 Shelton v National Roads and Motorists Association Ltd (2004) 51 ACSR 278; [2004] FCA 1393 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 133 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCA 344 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Andrew Toth (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff in person Mr G Bateman (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate