NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lumsden [2019] NSWDC 149 Hearing dates: 15 March 2019 Date of orders: 15 March 2019 Decision date: 15 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Grant DCJ Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) Conviction quashed and all other orders of the Local Court set aside. (3) I find the appellant not guilty and dismiss the charges. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal and review — Appeal from Local Court to District Court — By person convicted against conviction CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Right to silence — Lack of cross-examination of complainant Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R. 67, H.L. Charara v Queen (2006) NSWCCA 244 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118; (2003) 77 ALJR 989; (2003) 197 ALR 201 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Wade Ian Risk Lumsden (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Royce (Appellant) Mrs N Walmsley (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00008886 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Local Court Jurisdiction: Windsor Date of Decision: 14 September 2018 Before: Magistrate Milovanovich File Number(s): 2018/00008886
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate