NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Li v Attorney General for New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 95 Hearing dates: 31 January 2019 Date of orders: 03 May 2019 Decision date: 03 May 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; White JA at [69]; Brereton JA at [101] Decision: Dismiss the application for judicial review of the decision of Harrison J under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Pt 7. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – refusal to direct inquiry under Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Part 7 – decision by judge of a superior court
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – grounds of review – where decision is substantially similar to a party's submissions – whether judge failed to consider submissions – whether judge formed the relevant opinion – whether reasons were inadequate – whether justice seen to be done Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 74, 78, 79; Pt 7, Divs 2, 3 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10 Cases Cited: Al-Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 245 Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd (2013) 252 CLR 38; [2013] HCA 7 Australian Securities Commission v Schreuder (1994) 14 ACSR 614 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Beaman v Bond (2017) 254 FCR 480; [2017] FCAFC 142 Boele v Rinbac Pty Ltd (2014) 88 NSWLR 381; [2014] NSWCA 451 Bright v Westmoreland County 380 F 3d 729 (3d Cir 2004) Buttrose v Attorney General (NSW) (2015) 324 ALR 562; [2015] NSWCA 221 C v B (2006) 35 Fam LR 285; [2006] Fam CA 513 Calvin v Carr [1979] 1 NSWLR 1 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Carson v Legal Services Commissioner [2000] NSWCA 308 Cojocaru (Guardian Ad Litem) v British Columbia Women's Hospital 2011 BCCA 192; 17 BCLR (5th) 253 Cojocaru v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre 2013 SCC 30; [2013] 2 SCR 357 Commissioner for Railways for the State of Queensland v Peters (1991) 24 NSWLR 407 Connell v Auckland City Council [1977] 1 NZLR 630 Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Lines MacFarlane & Marshall Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 6 VR 1; [2002] VSCA 189 Forbes v New South Wales Trotting Club Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 242 Fyntray Constructions Pty Ltd v Macind Drainage & Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 238 GAR v Attorney General of New South Wales (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 314 Goodwin v Commissioner of Police [2012] NSWCA 379 Grierson v The King (1938) 60 CLR 431; [1938] HCA 45 Huluba v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 59 FCR 518 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 475 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2000] HCA 48 Juneja v Tax Practitioners Board (2017) 72 AAR 407; [2017] FCA 908 Li v R [2014] NSWCCA 341 LVR (WA) Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; [2012] FCAFC 90 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Moylan v Nutrasweet Co [2000] NSWCA 337 Palmer v Clarke (1989) 19 NSWLR 158 Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Pollard v Wilson [2010] NSWCA 68 Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656; [1986] HCA 7 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Maxwell (1998) 217 ALR 452 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212; [2003] HCA 56 Resource Pacific Pty Limited v Wilkinson [2013] NSWCA 33 Rodchompoo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 965 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd v Massoud [1989] VR 8 SZMUV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 205 SZNRZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 107 Vannini v Worldwide Demolitions Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 324 Wainohu v State of New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; [2011] HCA 24 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick Lam Li (Applicant) Attorney General for New South Wales (First Respondent) Supreme Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self-represented Mr R Yezevski (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate