NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Stevenson (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 492 Hearing dates: 24 April 2019 Date of orders: 03 May 2019 Decision date: 03 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Interim supervision order for 28 days with two qualified psychiatrists or a psychiatrist and a psychologist appointed to conduct separate examinations of the defendant Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offender – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – preliminary hearing – interim supervision order sought – defendant also subject to Child Protection Prohibition Order – whether matters, if proved, would satisfy Court to high degree of probability that defendant poses unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence – consideration of psychiatric reports and Risk Assessment Reports – no serious sexual offence committed since 2011 – history of breaching good behaviour bonds, parole and extended supervision orders – interim orders made Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW), s 13(1) Child Protection (Offenders Registration) 2000 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 3, 5(1)(a), 5B(a)-(d), 5D, 5I, 7(4), 9(2), 9(3), 10A, 11 Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), s 27 Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Brookes [2008] NSWSC 150 State of New South Wales v Elomar (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1034 State of New South Wales v Golding (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1041 State of New South Wales v Jason Leslie Stevenson [2013] NSWSC 619 State of New South Wales v Kamm (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1 State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1242 State of New South Wales v Stevenson [2013] NSWSC 1070 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Jason Leslie Stevenson (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms G E Lewer (Plaintiff) Ms S Hall (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate