NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mastronardo v Commonwealth Bank of Australia t/as BankWest [2019] NSWCA 99 Hearing dates: 29 April 2019 Decision date: 29 April 2019 Before: Meagher JA Decision: 1. Dismiss the applicants' notice of motion filed 29 April 2019 seeking a stay of execution of the writs of possession of the properties at 8 and 8A Pile Street, Gladesville. 2. Order the applicants pay the respondent's costs of that motion. Catchwords: PRACTICE – stay pending application for leave to appeal – whether sufficiently arguable error of primary judge in exercise of discretion to justify stay of execution of writs for possession – no question of principle Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Carmelo Adriano Mastronardo (first applicant) Claudia Alejandro Mastronardo (second applicant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia t/as BankWest (respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Cashion SC (applicants) M Dempsey SC, MC Rose (respondent)
Solicitors: Tomaras Lawyers (applicants) Norton Rose Fulbright (respondent) File Number(s): 2019/132382 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2019] NSWSC 466 Date of Decision: 26 April 2019 Before: Fagan J File Number(s): 2014/86502
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate