NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vella v Penrith City Council [2019] NSWLEC 62 Hearing dates: 16 April 2019 Date of orders: 16 April 2019 Decision date: 16 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: (1) The Applicant is given leave to rely on amended plans; (2) Pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, the Applicant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent that have been thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application for development consent; and (3) NSW Department of Education is joined as a party in these proceedings. Catchwords: APPLICATION TO RELY ON AMMENDED PLANS - Applicant to rely on amended plans - no opposition by consent authority - leave granted - costs to be paid to consent of costs thrown away as a result of the amendment APPLICATION TO BE JOINED AS A PARTY - right of Crown (Department of Education) to appear pursuant to s 64(1) of Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - application for joinder separate and in addition to right of appearance - intention to raise issue in public interest where consent authority not raising issue - public authority acting in public interest not an issue of protecting private interests - in the public interest that the Department of Education be joined - no delay to hearing - no additional expert evidence required - Department joined as Second Respondent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.15 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 64(1) State Environmental Planning Policy (Educational Establishments and Child Care Facilities) 2017 Cases Cited: Azzure-Blacktown Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2009] NSWLEC 63 Bongiorno Hawkins Frassetto & Associates Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2007] NSWLEC 205 Morrison Design v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 802 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Jesse James David Vella (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) NSW Department of Education (Intervener) Representation: Solicitors: Mr S Kondilios, Hall & Wilcox (Applicant) Mr C Drury, Sparke Helmore (Respondent) Ms M Peatman (Intervener) File Number(s): 273859-002 and 273859-003 of 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate