NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wily & Hurst [2019] NSWSC 521 Hearing dates: 5, 6 September 2017 Date of orders: 09 May 2019 Decision date: 09 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Originating Process seeking inquiry under Corporations Act, s 536, dismissed with costs Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – external administration – liquidators – supervisory jurisdiction – application for inquiry into conduct of liquidations – where ASIC conducted investigation into conduct of liquidations – whether sufficient case of misconduct to warrant inquiry – whether liquidators should have declined appointment on account of apparent conflicts, or disclosed those conflicts – whether liquidators ought to have reported possibilities of shadow directors and unlawful phoenixing – where administrations without assets – discretionary considerations – strength and nature of allegations – delay – utility – availability of alternative remedies – role of "second appointee" in joint and several appointment – subsequent practice – financial circumstances Legislation Cited: (CTH) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, s 13(3), s 19, s 33 (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 60, s 206F, s 506A, s 513, s 532, s 533, s 536, s 545, s 1279, s 1282, s 1283, s 1290(1), s 1292(3), s 1560(4), s 1617, Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) cl 40-55, cl 40-65, cl 45-1, Div 90, cls 90‑5, 90‑10, 90‑15, 90‑20 (CTH) Corporations Regulations 2001, reg 10.25.02(3)(i) (CTH) Insolvency Law Reform Act 2016, Sch 2 (NSW) Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, r 7.11 Cases Cited: ACN 151 726 224 Pty Ltd (in liq), In the matter of [2016] NSWSC 1801 Ah Toy v Registrar of Companies (NT) (1986) 10 FCR 356; (1986) 10 ACLR 630; (1986) 4 ACLC 480 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edge (2007) 211 FLR 137; [2007] VSC 170 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Farley (2001) 51 NSWLR 494; [2001] NSWSC 326 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hamilton (CALDB, 3 April 2014, Matter No 04/NSW13) Belvista Pty Ltd v Murphy & Triden Contractors Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 628 Biposo Pty Ltd, Re (1995) 17 ACSR 730 BL & GY International Co Ltd v Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd (2010) 79 ACSR 558; [2010] NSWSC 959 Boral Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd v Magill (1993) 32 NSWLR 501 Burns Philp Investments Pty Ltd v Dickens (No 1) (1993) 11 ACLC 272 Burns Philp Investments Pty Ltd v Dickens (No 2) (1993) 31 NSWLR 280; (1993) 10 ACSR 626; (1993) 11 ACLC 525 Clasquin SA v AAR International Pty Ltd (1989) 15 ACLR 9 Commissioner for Corporate Affairs (Vic) v Harvey [1980] VR 669; (1979) 4 ACLR 259 Day & Dent Constructions Pty Ltd, Re (1984) 32 NTR 13; (1984) 75 FLR 355; (1984) 9 ACLR 319; (1985) 3 ACLC 11 Fox Home Loans Pty Ltd (in liq), Re [2005] NSWSC 1050 GIS Electrical Pty Ltd v Melsom (2002) 172 FLR 218; (2002) 43 ACSR 481; (2003) 21 ACLC 46; [2002] WASCA 302 Glowbind Pty Ltd (in liq), Re; Takchi v Parbery (2003) 181 FLR 208; (2003) 48 ACSR 456; (2004) 22 ACLC 642; [2003] NSWSC 1190 Hall v Poolman (2009) 75 NSWLR 99; (2009) 254 ALR 333; (2009) 71 ACSR 139; [2009] NSWCA 64 Heesh and Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board, Re (2001) 61 ALD 555; (2001) 37 ACSR 198; [2001] AATA 87 Herron v McGregor (1986) 6 NSWLR 246 Hill v King (1993) 31 NSWLR 654 Jenkins v Jonkay Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 858 Kennards Hire Pty Ltd v RMGA Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1387 Leslie v Hennessy; Re Aboriginal Councils and Associations Act 1976 [2001] FCA 371 Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1457 Love, Re (2003) 44 ACSR 367; [2003] NSWSC 58 Mamone v Pantzer (2001) 36 ACSR 743; [2001] NSWSC 26 Meagher v Stephenson (1993) 30 NSWLR 736 Murdaca v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2009) 178 FCR 119; [2009] FCAFC 92 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279; [2001] NSWCA 284 Northbourne Developments Pty Ltd v Reiby Chambers Pty Ltd (1989) 19 NSWLR 434; (1989) 1 ACSR 79; (1989) 8 ACLC 39 Queensland Bacon Pty Ltd v Rees (1966) 115 CLR 266; [1966] HCA 21 Richmond Sales Pty Ltd (in liq) v McDermott (2006) 224 ALR 405; (2006) 56 ACSR 323; [2006] FCA 52 Singleton Earthmoving Equipment Hire Pty Ltd v Singleton Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 688 Sydlow Pty Ltd (in liq) v TG Kotselas Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 234; (1996) 20 ACSR 47; (1996) 14 ACLC 846 Warner, Re GTL Tradeup Pty Ltd (in liq) (2015) 104 ACSR 633; [2015] FCA 323 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Plaintiff) Andrew Hugh Jenner Wily (First Defendant) David Anthony Hurst (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A P Lo Surdo SC w J Shephard (Plaintiff) I M Jackman SC (First Defendant) I R Pike SC (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate