NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Moubarak v Le (No. 2) [2019] NSWDC 170 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 May 2019 Decision date: 10 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 35. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – application for costs variation – where Defendant succeeded in defeating significant claims for heads of damage - whether costs order should be proportionate to plaintiff's monetary verdict. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No.2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Colak v Ghalloub (No.2) [2017] NSWDC 351 Gladio Pty Ltd v Buckworth (No.2) [2015] NSWSC 1462 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 McLennon v Antonios (No.2) [2014] NSWDC 38 Milich v Council of the City of Canterbury (No.3) [2012] NSWSC 1280 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (No.2) [2014] NSWCA 425 New South Wales v Quirk [2012] NSWCA 216 O'Reilly v Western Sussex NHS Trust (No.7) [2015] NSWSC 233 Ohn v Walton (1995) 36 NSWLR 77 State of New South Wales v Stevens (2012) 82 NSWLR 106 Category: Costs Parties: Mr Moubarak (Plaintiff) Mr English (First Defendant) Mr Le (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D-L Del Monte (Plaintiff) Mr B Wilson (First and Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate