NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Menz v Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 541 Hearing dates: 24, 25, 26 and 27 September 2018 Date of orders: 20 May 2019 Decision date: 20 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: TORTS – Negligence – Where plaintiff was "warming up" riding a horse at an agricultural show prior to competing in an event – Where children were playing nearby – Where noise created by children caused a horse nearby to be startled – Where plaintiff's horse fell to the ground causing the plaintiff serious injury – Whether the defendant breached any duty of care owed to the plaintiff – Whether the plaintiff's injuries were due to the materialisation of an obvious risk of a dangerous recreational activity – Whether the plaintiff's injuries were the result of the materialisation of an obvious risk – Whether the plaintiff's injuries were the materialisation of an inherent risk – Whether the risk of injury was the subject of a risk warning given to the plaintiff by the defendant Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Cases Cited: Action Paintball Games Pty Limited (In Liquidation) v Barker [2013] NSWCA 128 Avopiling v Bosevski [2018] NSWCA 14 Bitupave Limited t/as Boral Asphalt v Pillinger [2015] NSWCA 298; (2015) 72 MVR 460 Fallas v Mourlas (2006) 65 NSWLR 418; [2006] NSWCA 32 Falvo v Australian Oztag Sports Association [2006] NSWCA 17 Goode v Angland [2016] NSWSC 1014 Jaber v Rockdale City Council [2008] NSWCA 98 Menz v Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc (No.1) [2018] NSWSC 1446 Ohlstein and ors v E and T Lloyd t/as Otford Farm Trail Rides [2006] NSWCA 226 Sharp v Parramatta City Council [2015] NSWCA 260; (2015) 209 LGERA 220 Streller v Albury City Council [2013] NSWCA 348 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kerrie Anne Menz – Plaintiff Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc – Defendant Representation: Counsel: M Cranitch SC, M Inglis & R Wathukarage – Plaintiff J Sexton SC & D Kelly – Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate