NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Patricia Norman by her tutor Peter Joseph Norman v Norman [2019] NSWSC 551 Hearing dates: 14 May 2019 Date of orders: 14 May 2019 Decision date: 14 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: (1) The defendant is to give the plaintiff possession of the land comprised in the certificate of title folio identifier 42/36192, being the land situated at and known as 32 Oceana Street, Narraweena, in the State of New South Wales.
(2) The plaintiff is granted leave to issue a writ of possession forthwith.
(3) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.
(4) I transfer the proceedings brought by the defendant against the executor of the estate of the late David William Norman, being proceedings 2019/00094287, to the Family Provision List of Hallen J in the Equity Division of this Court.
(5) The notice of motion filed by the defendant in the proceedings in (4) above is to be returnable before Hallen J on 31 May 2019. Catchwords: POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS – Where defendant filed appearance submitting to the orders of the Court – Order for possession granted
STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – Where defendant did not oppose order for possession – Where defendant then sought a stay of such order for a period of six to eight weeks – Evidence that the defendant had been on notice of the possession proceedings for almost 5 months – Where the defendant had repeatedly refused to vacate the property when requested to do so – Submission made that it is "usual" to make an order for a stay – Necessity to take into account all relevant circumstances in the exercise of the discretion to grant a stay – Application for a stay refused Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: G E Personal Finance Pty Ltd v Smith [2006] NSWSC 889 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Limited [2009] NSWCA 268 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Norman by her tutor Peter Joseph Norman – Plaintiff Rhys Norman - Defendant Representation: Counsel: J Emmett – Plaintiff N Condylis - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate