NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Horswill v McClellan [2019] NSWSC 557 Hearing dates: 13 May 2019 Date of orders: 16 May 2019 Decision date: 16 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Orders made for specific performance Catchwords: LAND LAW – contract for sale of land – claim for specific performance – doctrine of part performance – plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining properties – plaintiffs entered into oral agreement with defendants to purchase part of the defendants' property – requisite boundary adjustment to be effected by means of two separate subdivisions – where the parties completed the first subdivision but first defendant refused to proceed with the second subdivision – whether sufficient acts of part performance – sufficient acts of part performance established – specific performance granted Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1990 (NSW), s 7 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 54A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 29.7 Cases Cited: Maddison v Alderson (1883) 8 App Cas 467 McBride v Sandland (1918) 25 CLR 69 Pipikos v Trayans (2018) 92 ALJR 880; [2018] HCA 39 Phung v Phung [2019] NSWSC 117 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Leslie Horswill (First Plaintiff) Kim Maree Horswill (Second Plaintiff) Adam Leslie McClellan (First Defendant) Jennifer Anne McClellan (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D C Price (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate