NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Loumbos v Gray [2019] NSWSC 569 Hearing dates: 15 May 2019 Date of orders: 20 May 2019 Decision date: 20 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Respondents to furnish the plaintiff's file to plaintiff forthwith upon plaintiff complying with the condition that he pays either into Court or a mutually satisfactory trust fund the sum of $30,000 as security for respondents' costs Catchwords: COSTS – where respondents validly assert a lien over file of plaintiff as security for unpaid costs – where there is no evidence that the plaintiff could not pay the amount claimed by the respondents – whether current litigation would be stultified if plaintiff required to provide security to the respondents beyond an offer to pay the claimed costs at a later time – whether the security that the plaintiff should furnish as a condition of the provision of the file by the respondents is reasonable – whether respondents' alleged failure to comply with Legal Profession Uniform Law s 174(1) affects their right to claim a lien – plaintiff to pay by way of security for the release of the file a proportion of the costs claimed by respondent Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 174, 178, 472 Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules (NSW) 2015, r 15 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Valentine John Loumbos (Plaintiff) Fortis Law Group Pty Limited (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: D Moujalli (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Australian Business Lawyers & Advisors (Plaintiff) Fortis Law Group Pty Limited (Respondents) File Number(s): 2017/208822 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate