NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Berger v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 119 Hearing dates: 18 and 19 October 2018 Date of orders: 23 May 2019 Decision date: 23 May 2019 Before: Meagher JA at [1], Payne JA at [2], Simpson AJA at [381] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Mr Berger to pay the costs of the Law Society of the appeal. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS – legal practitioners – penalty appeal – whether the Tribunal erred in removing the solicitor's name from the roll – failure to make costs disclosures and provide costs agreement to clients – causing deficiencies in trust account – misappropriation of trust monies – applying received monies in breach of the terms of agreement under which they were received – overcharging – purporting to act as executor when no grant of probate – purporting to act as attorney when donor of power was deceased – breach of costs disclosure undertakings given to Legal Services Commissioner – failure to comply with Supreme Court order – Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) – Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW)
OCCUPATIONS – legal practitioners – whether a case of dishonesty had been pleaded or conducted – whether findings made by the Tribunal of dishonesty were open – whether findings made by the Tribunal that the appellant knew he was acting dishonestly were open Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Schs 1, 4, 5 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW), s 180 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 254, 255, 259, 309, 310, 311, 312, 316, 317, 328, 368, 370, 372, 393, 496, 497, 562 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), Sch 4 Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 61 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48, 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.36, 51.53 Cases Cited: Achurch v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 141; [2014] HCA 10 Atwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 259 CLR 1; [2016] HCA 16 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Doherty [2010] NSWCA 177 Dupal v The Law Society of New South Wales [1990] NSWCA 56 Ex parte Lenehan (1948) 77 CLR 403; [1948] HCA 45 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Johns v Law Society of New South Wales [1982] 2 NSWLR 1 Konstantinidis v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 59 Kumar v Legal Services Commissioner [2015] NSWCA 161 Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230; [2003] HCA 24 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279; [2001] NSWCA 284 O'Connor v Fitti [2000] NSWSC 540 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493; [1998] HCA 7 Pham v Legal Services Commissioner [2016] VSCA 256 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v P [2003] NSWCA 320 R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Victor Berger (Appellant) Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D A Lloyd / M Kalyk (Appellant) B Tronson / M Nesbeth (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate