NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Obierzynski v R [2019] NSWCCA 103 Hearing dates: 6 May 2019 Date of orders: 07 June 2019 Decision date: 07 June 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Hamill J at [2] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – conviction appeal – where applicant convicted of having taken and driven a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner in circumstances of aggravation – whether trial judge erred in circumstantial evidence direction to the jury – whether trial judge erroneously minimised the lack of identification of the applicant as the important issue in the applicant's response to the Crown case – whether trial judge should have excluded parts of the ERISP in which the police purported to identify the applicant in CCTV footage – whether verdict is unreasonable – appeal dismissed
CRIME – sentence appeal – where applicant sentenced to imprisonment of 7 years with non-parole period of 5 years – whether sentence manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 154C Cases Cited: Atai v R [2014] NSWCCA 210 Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82; [1975] HCA 42 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Mundarra Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650; [2001] HCA 50 R v Wilson (2005) 62 NSWLR 346; [2005] NSWCCA 20 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 South v R [2007] NSWCCA 117 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zachary Obierzynski (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) K Ratcliffe (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate