NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Minister for Corrections v Berwyn Rees [2019] NSWSC 610 Hearing dates: 24 April 2019 Decision date: 23 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), relief in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision of the Second Defendant of 21 February 2019 to release the First Defendant on parole; and
(2) Pursuant to s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), relief in the nature of mandamus directing that the Second Defendant determine the First Defendant's application for parole in accordance with the law. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – Administrative law – decision of State Parole Authority (SPA) to grant parole – whether jurisdictional error or error on face of record – whether failure to have regard to mandatory consideration of effect on members of families of deceased persons of offender being released to parole, pursuant to s 135(3)(d) of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) (the Act) – whether reasons of SPA adequate pursuant to s 193C(2)(a) of the Act – decision of SPA quashed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 135(3)(d) and 193C(2)(a) Cases Cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Liew [2012] NSWSC 1223; Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts (2011) 180 LGERA 99; [2011] FCAFC 59; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 389; [1949] HCA 33; Hossain v Minister For Immigration And Border Protection (2018) ALJR 780; [2018] HCA 34; Minister for Corrections v Cawthray and the State Parole Authority [2015] NSWSC 1188; R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation & Arbitration; Tickner v Chapman (1995) 133 ALR 226 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Minister for Corrections (Plaintiff) Berwyn Rees (First Defendant) State Parole Authority (Second Defendant) Commissioner for Corrective Services (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J E Davidson (Plaintiff) L J Karp (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate