NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lee v Cumberland Council [2019] NSWLEC 1226 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 3 May 2019 Date of orders: 24 May 2019 Decision date: 24 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The applicants are given leave to amend the development application and rely upon the plans in the proceedings referred to at condition 1 in Annexure A. (2) The applicants are to pay the respondent's s 8.15(3) costs thrown away in the proceeding as agreed or assessed. (3) The applicants have filed a written request pursuant to clause 4.6 of Auburn LEP 2010 prepared by Nexus Environmental Planned Pty Ltd and dated 8 May 2019. The request accords with the amended plans. I have received that request and, in accordance with clause 4.6(4) of LEP 2010, I am satisfied that: (a) the written request adequately establishes sufficient environmental planning grounds that justify the breach of the height standard; (b) the written request demonstrates that compliance with the height development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary as the objectives of the height development standard are met notwithstanding the non-compliance; and (c) on this basis I am satisfied that the requirements of clause 4.6 of LEP 2010 are met. (4) The appeal is upheld. (5) Development application DA-320/2016 seeking the demolition of existing structures and construction of a 10 storey shop top housing development over basement car parking at 54-56 Joseph Street, Lidcombe is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – shop top housing –conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Auburn Local Environmental Plan 2010 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land State Environmental Planning Policy No 65—Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joung Sup Lee (First Applicant) Sod Hee Lee (Second Applicant) Cumberland Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicants) A Gough, Storey & Gough Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/236288 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate