NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Johnson (No 8) [2019] NSWSC 613 Hearing dates: 10 May 2019 Date of orders: 24 May 2019 Decision date: 24 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: For the common assault of Scott Campbell on 29 June 2017 convicted and sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 10 months, commencing on 29 June 2017 and expiring on 28 April 2018.
For the murder of David Morrison sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 26 years and six months, having a non-parole period of 20 years, commencing on 29 September 2017 and expiring on 28 September 2037 with an additional term of 6 years and 6 months commencing on 29 September 2037 and expiring on 28 March 2044. You will first be eligible for parole after the expiration of the non-parole period on 28 September 2037. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentencing – murder – considerations for court to take into account – criminal record – moral culpability – requirement not to impose fresh penalty for past offending – requirement to give full weight to profound childhood deprivation – contrition and remorse – not made out on balance of probabilities – limited prospects of rehabilitation – recidivous homicide – absence of remorse – danger presented to society – requirement that facts relied upon in sentencing must be established beyond reasonable doubt
CRIMINAL LAW – Principles of sentencing – denunciation – retribution – general deterrence – specific deterrence attenuated by moral culpability
SENTENCING – Special circumstances – whether statutory ratio between the non-parole period and additional term to be altered – statutory ratio maintained – non-parole period 20 years – additional term 6 years Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21, 21A, 22, 22A, 61 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 19A, Crimes (High Risk Offenders Act) 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2012) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Herne [2001] NSWCCA 37 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v Johnson (No 7) [2019] NSWSC 148 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 467 Versluys v R [2014] NSWCCA 98 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Douglas Johnson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: G.J. Tabuteau (Crown) E. Ozen SC (Defence)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate