NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Byrnes [2019] NSWSC 616 Hearing dates: 15 – 18, 22 – 26, 29 – 31 October 2018, 1, 5 – 6, 9 November 2018 Date of orders: 30 May 2019 Decision date: 30 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Application for a certificate under s 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) is dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS – costs in criminal cases – acquittal of applicant by directed verdict – court discretion exercised to disallow particular evidence of guilt – use of that evidence under s 3A of the Costs in Criminal Proceedings Act 1967 (NSW) – able to be used – not unreasonable to prosecute given all the evidence Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Proceedings Act 1967 (NSW), ss 2, 3 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: AB v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 122 Allerton v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1991) 24 NSWLR 550 Doney v R (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v R (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 121 R v Byrnes [2019] NSWSC 615 R v Hull (1989) 16 NSWLR 385 R v Rossi-Murray; R v Byrnes [2019] NSWSC 479 R v Zraika [2019] NSWSC 598 Category: Costs Parties: Regina (Crown) Bradley James Byrnes (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P Barrett (Crown) H White (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate