NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: IAG Limited trading as NRMA Insurance v Lucic [2019] NSWSC 620 Hearing dates: 22 May 2019 Decision date: 28 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Dismiss the amended summons filed on 22 May 2019.
(2) Order the plaintiff to pay the first and fourth defendants' costs. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – effect of – abuse of process – issue estoppel – whether arises from assessment of notional damages in proceedings brought by workers compensation insurer against compulsory third party insurer on statutory indemnity under s 151Z of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) – no issue estoppel as distinct causes of action
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – effect of – relationship between s 151Z action by worker's insurer against wrongdoer for indemnity for payments of compensation made and tort claim by worker for damages against wrongdoer
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – requirement for CARS assessor to consider submissions of parties and address in reasons
MOTOR ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION – damages – challenge to awards for past and future economic loss – level of particularity required Legislation Cited: Married Women's Property Act 1882 (NSW), s 12 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 34, 58, 61, 69, 81, 92, 94, 95, 99, 104, 106, 122, 126 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 94 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Workers Compensation Act 1926 (NSW), s 64 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr (2012) 83 NSWLR 302; [2012] NSWCA 13 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Sprod (2012) 81 NSWLR 626; [2012] NSWCA 281 Brown v Lewis (2006) 65 NSWLR 587; [2006] NSWCA 87 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427; [1994] HCA 15 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 Government Insurance Office (NSW) v McDonald (1991) 25 NSWLR 492 Grant v Royal Rehabilitation Centre (1999) 47 NSWLR 263; [1999] NSWCA 250 Kay v Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd [2014] NSWSC 744 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550; [1985] HCA 81 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 Manners v Transfield (1992) 8 WAR 111 O'Brien v McKean (1968) 118 CLR 540; [1968] HCA 58 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Port of Melbourne Authority Pty Limited v Anshun (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Dolan (2004) 62 NSWLR 42; [2004] NSWCA 458 Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271; [1968] HCA 34 Rippon v Chilcotin (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Rodger v De Gelder [2015] NSWCA 211; (2015) 71 MVR 514 Saaed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252; [2010] HCA 23 The Nominal Defendant v Aychahawchar [2015] NSWCA 58; (2015) 70 MVR 89 Tickle Industries Pty Limited v Hahn (1974) 130 CLR 321; [1974] HCA 5 Tiufino v Warland (2000) 50 NSWLR 104; [2000] NSWCA 110 Tomlinson v Ramsay Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 Tooth and Company Limited v Tillyer (1956) 95 CLR 605; [1956] HCA 49 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 WorkCover Queensland v Amaca Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 420; [2010] HCA 34 Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Nominal Defendant [2013] NSWCA 301; (2013) 64 MVR 542 Zahed v IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2016] NSWCA 55; (2016) 75 MVR 1 Texts Cited: KR Handley, Spencer Bower and Handley Res Judicata (4th ed, 2009, LexisNexis) Motor Accidents Authority, "Claims Assessment Guidelines", 1 May 2014, cll 16.2, 18.4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance (Plaintiff) Steven Lucic (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) Allan Crowley, in his capacity as a Claims Assessor of State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Third Defendant) Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: MA Robinson SC/ AE Maroya/J Gumbert (Plaintiff) AJ Stone SC/BG McManamey (First Defendant) R Sheldon SC (Fourth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate