NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Singh v R [2019] NSWCCA 110 Hearing dates: 10 May 2019 Date of orders: 03 June 2019 Decision date: 03 June 2019 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Harrison J at [60]; R A Hulme J at [61] Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction –aggravated break and enter dwelling-house and commit serious indictable offence – Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 112 – relationship of s 112 with burglary at common law – meaning of "break" – whether "constructive breaking" to knock at a door of a house with intent to rob its occupants and, upon the door being opened, to rush into the house
CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – whether to allow withdrawal of guilty plea – where alleged that the agreed facts do not support the charge
CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – failure to take into account a relevant consideration –gambling disorder – substance use disorder
CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – manifest excess – whether guideline judgment in R v Henry should have been considered Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 97, 105A, 112 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A Cases Cited: Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Ghamrawi v R (2017) 95 NSWLR 405; [2017] NSWCCA 195 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 Johnston v R [2017] NSWCCA 53 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Jafari [2017] NSWCCA 152 R v Stanford (2007) 70 NSWLR 474; [2007] NSWCCA 370 Ritchie v R [2017] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: W Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Clarendon Press, 1769) TR Fitzwalter Butler and M Garsia (eds), Archbold: Pleading, Evidence and Practice in Criminal Cases 1822 (Sweet & Maxwell, 36th ed, 1966) JW Cecil Turner (ed), Kenny's Outlines of Criminal Law 1902 (Cambridge University Press, 19th ed, 1966) W Hawkins, Pleas of the Crown 1716-1721 (Professional Books, 1980) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amandeep Singh (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D A Marr (Applicant) G Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate