NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Le; R v Loeung [2019] NSWSC 632 Hearing dates: 24 April 2019 Date of orders: 26 April 2019 Decision date: 31 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: Applications for directed verdicts dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – applications for directed verdicts – joint criminal enterprise – where offenders charged with "being armed with a weapon, namely, three knives with intent to commit an indictable offence, namely, assault" – whether evidence capable of supporting verdict of guilty – whether competing inferences available Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blundell v R [2019] NSWCCA 3 Doney v R (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 R v Bilick and Starke (1984) 36 SASR 322; (1984) 11 A Crim R 452 R v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 Saffron v Director of Public Prosecutions; Allen v Director of Public Prosecutions (1989) 16 NSWLR 397 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Duc Thuong Le (Offender) Nou Sovathara Loeung (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Morris (Crown) Mr B Pierce (Offender Le) Mr W Teracini SC with Mr B Murray (Offender Loeung)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Archbold Legal (Offender Le) McAneny Lawyers (Offender Loeung) File Number(s): 2016/50522; 2016/47425 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate